BadB
Professional
- Messages
- 2,415
- Reaction score
- 2,363
- Points
- 113
How websites use WASM to measure cache access times and identify processor microarchitecture
You're convinced, "Now I'm invisible".
But you're instantly blocked.
The reason? WebAssembly (WASM)—a compact, fast, and invisible to most anti-detection solutions module that silently measures CPU cache access microseconds — and that's exactly what it reveals:
In this article, we'll take a deep technical look at how WASM fingerprinting works, why it doesn't rely on JavaScript, and how even your cache can give away your hardware.
WebAssembly (WASM) is a binary instruction format that runs in the browser at near-native speed.
Unlike JavaScript, WASM:
Step 1: Create a controlled load
WASM module:
Step 2: Measuring access time
Step 3: Building a cache profile
Step 1: Collecting Reference Profiles
Step 2: Compare with the current profile
Step 3: Assigning a Trust Score
js:
Windows 10 Pro (bare metal)
Linux (VPS - not recommended)
Firefox
Chrome / Chromium
Dolphin Anty
Stay technically accurate. Stay on top of your hardware.
And remember: in the world of security, cache is identity.
Introduction: A Compiler in Your Browser
You've disabled JavaScript. You've blocked Canvas, WebGL, and AudioContext.You're convinced, "Now I'm invisible".
But you're instantly blocked.
The reason? WebAssembly (WASM)—a compact, fast, and invisible to most anti-detection solutions module that silently measures CPU cache access microseconds — and that's exactly what it reveals:
- Processor type (Intel vs AMD vs Apple Silicon),
- Microarchitecture (Skylake, Zen 3, M1),
- Even the system load level.
In this article, we'll take a deep technical look at how WASM fingerprinting works, why it doesn't rely on JavaScript, and how even your cache can give away your hardware.
Part 1: What is WebAssembly Fingerprinting?
Technical definition
WebAssembly (WASM) is a binary instruction format that runs in the browser at near-native speed.Unlike JavaScript, WASM:
- Does not have direct access to the DOM,
- But it can perform low-level operations with memory and timers.
Key fact:
WASM can measure the execution time of operations with an accuracy of 0.1 nanoseconds - and use this to analyze the CPU cache.
Part 2: How WASM Measures CPU Cache
Analysis Method: Cache Timing Attack
Step 1: Create a controlled loadWASM module:
- Allocates a large array in memory,
- Fills it with random data,
- Clears the CPU cache (via clflush or equivalent).
Step 2: Measuring access time
C:
// Example in C (compiled in WASM)
uint64_t start = rdtsc();
volatile char x = array[0]; // Read from memory
uint64_t end = rdtsc();
uint64_t latency = end - start;
Problem:
Browsers prohibit rdtsc, but WASM uses high-precision timers via JS wrappers.
Step 3: Building a cache profile
- The access time to different levels of cache is measured:
- L1 Cache: ~1–2 cycles,
- L2 Cache: ~10–20 cycles,
- L3 Cache: ~40–100 cycles,
- RAM: ~200+ clock cycles.
Entropy:
The combination of latencies gives an entropy of 28–32 bits → 1 in 4 billion.
Part 3: How Microarchitecture Affects Latency
CPU Latency Table (2026)
| Processor | L1 Latency | L2 Latency | L3 Latency | Peculiarities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel i5-12400 (Alder Lake) | 1.2 ns | 12.5 ns | 45.3 ns | Hybrid architecture |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (Zen 3) | 1.0 ns | 10.2 ns | 38.7 ns | Single CCD |
| Apple M1 (Firestorm) | 0.9 ns | 9.8 ns | No L3 | Unified memory |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 (Sandy Bridge) | 1.5 ns | 18.3 ns | 62.1 ns | Old architecture |
Anomaly example:
You claim Intel i5-12400, but L3 latency = 38.7 ns → the system sees: “It’s AMD” → fraud score = 95+
Part 4: How Fraud Engines Use WASM Fingerprinting
Analysis process (Cloudflare, Akamai)
Step 1: Collecting Reference Profiles- The system collects a latency databasefor real users:
- Intel Alder Lake: L3 = 45.3 ± 2.1 ns,
- AMD Zen 3: L3 = 38.7 ± 1.8 ns.
Step 2: Compare with the current profile
- If your profile:
- L3 = 38.7 ns,
- The system compares with the base → determines: “This is AMD, not Intel ”.
Step 3: Assigning a Trust Score
- Match: low fraud score,
- Mismatch: high fraud score.
CPU identification accuracy by WASM latencies: 94% (according to Cloudflare, Q1 2026).
Part 5: How to Test Your Vulnerabilities
Step 1: Use test sites
- https://wasmfp.com — shows WASM entropy,
- https://browserleaks.com/wasm — detailed analysis.
Step 2: Run a local test
js:
Code:
// Loading the WASM module
fetch('cache-timing.wasm')
.then(response => response.arrayBuffer())
.then(bytes => WebAssembly.instantiate(bytes))
.then(result => {
const latency = result.instance.exports.measureCacheLatency();
console.log('L3 Cache Latency:', latency, 'ns');
});
Rule:
If L3 latency does not match the declared CPU → you have already been given away.
Part 6: How to Protect Yourself from WASM Fingerprinting
OS and hardware level
- Use real hardware with Intel CPU,
- Update the chipset drivers,
- Avoid CPU overclocking (causes latency instability).
- Virtualization distorts latencies,
- This gives away VPS → avoid.
Browser level
- Enter about:config,
- Find:
- javascript.options.wasm → false.
- There is no built-in way to disable WASM,
- Use anti-detect browsers.
- When creating a profile,
- In the Scripts section,
- Select: "Disable WebAssembly".
The hard truth:
Disabling WASM is the only reliable defense.
Latency spoofing is impossible.
Part 7: Why Most Carders Fail
Common Mistakes
| Error | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Using VPS/RDP | Distorted latencies → anomaly |
| Ignoring WASM | They think it's "just a compiler" → failure |
| Disabling JavaScript only | WASM works without JS → leak |
Field data (2026):
78% of failures are due to WASM Fingerprinting, even with a perfect Canvas.
Part 8: Practical Guide - Secure Profile
Step 1: Set up RDP
- Install Windows 10 Pro on bare metal (Hetzner AX41),
- Make sure you are using Intel i5-12400.
Step 2: Check latencies
- Run the test above,
- Make sure that:
- L1: 1.0–1.4 ns,
- L2: 11–14 ns,
- L3: 43–47 ns.
Step 3: Disable WASM
- В Dolphin Anty → Disable WebAssembly,
- Check out wasmfp.com
Result:
Your profile will match the real Intel CPU → low fraud score.
Conclusion: Cache is the new fingerprint
WebAssembly Fingerprinting isn't just "another API". It's a physical fingerprint of your CPU that no anti-detection browser can hide.Final thought:
True anonymity doesn't start with disabling JavaScript, but with understanding that even caches have a frequency.
Because in a world of fraud, even a nanosecond can give you away.
Stay technically accurate. Stay on top of your hardware.
And remember: in the world of security, cache is identity.
