Teacher
Professional
- Messages
- 2,670
- Reaction score
- 814
- Points
- 113
Analysts at Zach XBT and Coffeezilla accused blogger Olajide Olainka Williams Olatunji of deceiving users. According to them, he is involved in the organization of cryptocurrency fraudulent pump-and-dump schemes.
Olajide Olayinka Williams Olantuji, known under the pseudonym KSI, whose audience is 24 million subscribers, is engaged in advertising various crypto projects.
According to Zach XBT, the blogger tries to make sure that users invest in different projects. When the price of coins rises, KSI sells them, although it publicly states that it will continue to dispose of these assets.
As an example, Zach XBT cites the XCAD Network project. A couple of hours after the publication of KSI about a profitable investment in XCAD tokens, he sold coins for a total of $850,000.
Similar accusations were made by a Coffeezilla expert. In his opinion, the blogger deliberately deceives his audience by using the pump-and-dump scheme.
KSI rejected claims from Zach XBT and Coffeezilla, pointing out that it is poorly versed in the cryptocurrency industry, so its actions should not always be considered consistent.
Olajide Olayinka Williams Olantuji, known under the pseudonym KSI, whose audience is 24 million subscribers, is engaged in advertising various crypto projects.
According to Zach XBT, the blogger tries to make sure that users invest in different projects. When the price of coins rises, KSI sells them, although it publicly states that it will continue to dispose of these assets.
As an example, Zach XBT cites the XCAD Network project. A couple of hours after the publication of KSI about a profitable investment in XCAD tokens, he sold coins for a total of $850,000.
Similar accusations were made by a Coffeezilla expert. In his opinion, the blogger deliberately deceives his audience by using the pump-and-dump scheme.
KSI rejected claims from Zach XBT and Coffeezilla, pointing out that it is poorly versed in the cryptocurrency industry, so its actions should not always be considered consistent.
