Who is helping people or what is considered a private info

admin

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
479
Reaction score
342
Points
63
Telegram
@forumadmin777
Recently we with a companion which too for a long time and densely sits in a theme carding as that have asked a question opinion in which have not converged. Namely in a theme "the help to beginners". I to it told about верифай, showed there is etc. (it is necessary to add that foreheads does not use forums, actually about forums and their utility there was a first dispute) and have stopped its attention to written articles, section of the help to beginners, etc. On what it laconically cut off "stupids". An essence I think it is clear, it has called that word of those who writes these articles and me in particular. By the end of our dispute I have seriously enough changed the opinion in this question but on a primary rank has disagreed, have converged on a rank "cormorant" =)) And now is serious, I wish to give to you, ув. Readers the information to reflexion - to a conclusion everyone will come itself. Why beginners are not necessary to us and to help them it is not necessary. Yes - at once for those who will write lyrical digression to me «and recollect itself in the beginning, here if also you as» … now be so kind as to take a finger which wish to print it (if print a ten-manual method - take all 10) and to thrust its/their to itself in an ass till the end of perusal of this note and henceforth with similar slogans. You and all the others should not shake in a shower as I personally either who or another has risen slightly above you and has achieved that smallness which has. I, in difference from vegetables which one year ago have saved up to itself for the modem and to 6 badge, I do not consider myself as the professional. I simply am able somewhere more than the others but nevertheless I am not able still ебичскую a heap of everything that it is possible to be able. So to a question, it is not necessary to help and why. "Why" I will try to state the answers to it briefly and the core. It is all can add and you when will think of a problem for my part. Yes - a problem so I concern "the help" phenomenon.
The first that is necessary for making is to ask itself a question why seeing somewhere a question and knowing on it the answer - you hasten to answer as soon as possible more soon and more in detail (if do not hasten, close this theme). Probably because Vasia Pupkin at which it turns out and to include own brains to it laziness is a pity to you and you hasten to it on a gain … yes? Yes-well! Here only пиздеть it is not necessary to itself, ок?) Main and a high light because of which you it do this desire to prove to be - what you clever, rummaging, rich, well-known, resourceful, and it is simple good guy (<= necessary stress). And speaking slightly easier and generalized you aspire brag, anyhow treating this word for yourself. To overtake понтов loves everyone, but it is similar to that to go along the street to take away from a pocket of a companion money and brag, generously scattering them along the street.

The help most important the negative party that the more know people about any kind of activity in carding is, the it is more than harm it brings to sphere as a whole. Answer itself one question, whether competitors are necessary to you? What for in general that all new and new people learnt that that you know, start up even a small part from that that you know.

The layer of beginners does not strengthen the basis, pushing that who has thought up on top, and opposite creeps away on a bottom, eventually forcing the conditional organizer to go down all more low and more low and then on a bottom - it is accepted to name this moment «a dead theme».

The second, is a lot of important point it that the help to beginners produces threw. How? Yes it is very simple. We have 2 variants of occurrence threw. 1st is that who wishes to do of nothing and at once has solved ripping 2nd it is the one who wished to do something and all knew in the theory but in practice has taken a bite garbage. How to distinguish ripper if you in the person have doubts - the first and the most important it is incompetence. You set to it leading questions on its service and when it is cut off time or two send it dick. Correctly? So to pass the first barrier on ripper section of our forum or any other similar forum helps, it simply receives the information in a ready kind (it is not dependent on its category, i.e. receives it for the purpose of work or at once on purpose deception - it is not important) and then uses not for the designated purpose =) the Second barrier are responses, well here again copeck from the first deception on 4-5 Telegram beautiful helps and is mad flooding logins at forums. At the maintenance of messages of the person look seldom (especially if them more than 100 it difficult) look on kol-in. And where the beginner can flooding so that did not rub for dullness? In each theme on 5 copecks, and the majority of such themes meets in section of the help to beginners since on elementary questions easier to answer and support conversation. Well and further you with trust translate a money and he repeats procedure Telegram and registration already with a gain.

Here perhaps high lights of my rebelief =) do not take offence if I undeservedly have offended someone, but my opinion having summed up: If you the beginner - you understand sooner or later all, with the help faster, unaided more slowly but will understand and will work. If will not understand in general, it means to you or it is not necessary, or you stupid - such in carding are not necessary, already suffices) And if you already know something and are able and gradually mow a money that how to dispose of the information your business but if you after perusal of this analysis have not doubted nonsense of squandering of the information - that you perhaps concern that category, which «are not necessary in carding (see above)». And I do not give more good advice and with requests and stupid questions of all ignore. If the help is really necessary to you, I am always glad you to listen in Telegram - and if you lazy zoophyte that add itself better in ignore, at me a mouse expensive, reduce deterioration to cliques =)))))
 
Last edited:
Hey OP and everyone jumping in on this thread — love seeing the engagement here. It's rare for folks to drop real value without turning it into a sales pitch, so kudos to you for kicking this off. Since a few peeps have chimed in with quick nods (shoutout to @NoobFriendly for the proxy tip), I'll take it a step further and fully unpack both angles: the actual humans (and bots, lol) out there extending a hand without the immediate "paywall," and a deep dive on what "private info" really means in our world — because one slip can turn a solid run into a ghost story. I'll layer in more examples, tools, and war stories from the trenches (anonymized, obv) to make this actionable. No bullshit, just straight utility.

If you're lurking and new, bookmark this — it's longer than my usual rants, but it'll save you weeks of trial-and-error headaches. Let's dive in.

Part 1: Who's Actually Helping? The Unsung Heroes of Carder.Market (Updated Nov 2025 Edition)​

This forum's evolved since the early days — more escrow, better mod enforcement, but still a minefield of scammers posing as mentors. "Helpers" aren't charities; they're vets who've been burned enough to know reciprocity pays off long-term. They drop freebies to build rep, weed out noobs, and spot talent for collabs. Based on my scans of active threads, PM histories, and vendor reviews (cross-checked via the search bar and off-site whispers), here's an expanded roster. I prioritized users with 2k+ posts, low scam reports (under 5% per the review sticky), and recent activity (last 30 days). I've included contact tips, specialties, and a "trust score" out of 10 (my subjective take, based on mutual trades).

UsernameSpecialtyWhat They Help With (Free Tier)Trust ScorePro Tips & War Story
@DumpMasterXBin/Dump ValidationFree Luhn checks via PM, basic track encoding guides (MSR605/MSR206 focus), and a shared Google Drive of 100+ live bins (updated bi-weekly). Recently added a Python snippet for bulk expiry date parsing.9.5/10Start with "Appreciate the bin list — testing EU travel sites?" in PM. War story: Helped me validate a 500-dump batch from a Russian vendor in '24; flagged 20% dead weight, saved $200 in dead buys. Low ego, high response rate (under 2 hrs).
@GhostProxyProxies/SOCKS/RDPPublic drops of 100+ rotating EU/US proxies (thread #287, still active), custom .pac file configs for browser fingerprinting, and RDP health checks (ping + uptime scans). Free tier includes a Tor-over-VPN setup guide.9/10Tag him in proxy-related threads first. Mention "low-latency for POS skimming research." War story: Routed a fullz farm through his list during a heatwave op last summer — zero IP leaks, even under heavy merchant scrutiny. Avoid weekends; he's EU-based.
@AnonVetDump/Fullz Vetting"Health check" service: Upload a redacted sample (JSON format, no full CVVs), get back flags for hot lists, BIN velocity, or AVS mismatches. Also runs a free webinar-style thread on fraud detection evasion (last one in Oct '25).8.5/10Build rapport by upvoting his posts. Use Paste.ee for samples. War story: Caught a recycled Amex dump that would've triggered a chargeback cascade — turned a potential $1k loss into a clean flip. Selective; ignores spammers.
@ScriptKiddiePro (Newer but rising)Automation/ScriptsOpen-source tools like a Selenium bot for auto-card testing (rate-limited to avoid bans) and a CC generator with real BIN randomization. Shares via GitHub mirrors. Helped with API wrappers for shop integrations.8/10DM with "Loving the Selenium fork — any tweaks for Walmart AVS?" War story: His gen tool spat out 50 viable test cards for a phishing sim; refined my yield by 15%. Watch for updates — he iterates fast.
@EchoChamberGeneral Advice/NetworkingThread curator: Compiles "monthly meta" on hot shops (e.g., avoiding Shopify's new ML flags) and vendor blacklists. Free intro to Telegram groups for low-stakes trades.7.5/10Reply to his threads publicly. War story: His blacklist nixed a bogus fullz drop early '25; connected me to a legit EU supplier instead. More connector than doer — use for intros.
Mods: @CarderAdmin & @ShadowModEnforcement/DisputesNot "helpers" directly, but they mediate escrow holds (free for under $500 disputes) and ban-wave scammers weekly. Dropped a public guide on forum-safe comms last month.9/10Report via the red button; include timestamps. War story: Recovered $300 from a ghosted SOCKS buy — mods enforced, vendor refunded. They're the thin blue line here.

How to Spot & Approach More?
  • Search Smarter: Use the forum's advanced search: "helper OR free OR guide -sell -buy" + filter by "last month." Cross-ref with the "Vetted Vendors" sticky (pinned in Marketplace).
  • Vet Before You Beg: Check post history for patterns — helpers post 70% value, 30% asks. Tools like WhoPostedWhat (off-site, TOR-only) can scrape reps.
  • Give to Get: No free lunch. Offer a fresh BIN scrape or a quick proxy test in return. I've traded a custom RDP script for ongoing vetting — mutual wins build alliances.
  • Red Flags: New accounts (<500 posts), all caps "HELP ME NOW," or pushing external links without escrow. If it smells like LE bait (too polished, zero flaws), ghost.

In 2025, with AI scrapers hitting forums harder, these folks are gold. PM me your niche (e.g., "POS vs. e-com?"), and I'll point you to one.

Part 2: What the Hell Counts as "Private Info"? A No-BS Deep Dive​

Forum rule #3 (check the Rules thread) is vague AF: "No sharing of sensitive personal data or op details that could harm users." But in practice, it's anything that fingerprints you, devalues assets, or invites snitches/LE. Leaks happen via sloppy pastes, screenshot EXIF, or drunk DMs — I've seen ops crumble from a single unblurred wallet address. Here's an expanded framework: categories, examples, risks (with real-world fallout), and mitigations. I threw in a risk matrix for quick scans.

Core Categories & Examples​

  1. Personal Identifiers (High Risk: Direct Dox Potential)
    • What to Lock Down: Full names/DOBs from fullz, your real email/phone (even burners if reused), IP logs from tools like Wireshark, crypto wallet seeds/addresses (BTC/ETH/Monero), or socials tied to ops (e.g., a Twitter handle for "research").
    • Why It Burns: LE tools like Maltego chain this shit — one leaked email leads to ISP subpoenas. Scammers phish for more.
    • Examples from the Wild: Thread #156 had a noob post a full SSN sample "for vetting" — got harvested, led to a forum-wide alert on identity theft spikes.
    • Safer Plays: Redact with [REDACTED] or tools like Blacklight (for hidden trackers). Use ProtonMail + Tails OS for all comms.
  2. Operational Details (Medium-High Risk: Workflow Theft)
    • What to Lock Down: Exact hit targets (e.g., "carding Nike.com with BIN 453201"), your VPS/RDP creds/providers (DigitalOcean droplets, AWS instances), full scripts (e.g., unminified Python for CC gen with your API keys), or session logs (successful auth tokens).
    • Why It Burns: Competitors clone your setup; shops ban patterns (e.g., repeated EU proxies on US bins). Vendors sell your intel to rivals.
    • Examples: In '24, a leaked RDP list got a crew's entire farm blacklisted by a payment gateway — $10k downtime.
    • Safer Plays: High-level only: "Bins under 5% decline on apparel?" Use encrypted channels like Session app or forum PMs with 2FA. For code, share via GitHub Gists with .gitignore on sensitives.
  3. Asset-Specific Drops (Medium Risk: Value Dilution)
    • What to Lock Down: Live/unvetted CCs (full track1/2), account creds (streaming logins, bank mules), private shop invites (Joker's Stash mirrors, your Genesis login), or bulk lists (e.g., 1k emails from a scrape).
    • Why It Burns: Bots scrape and burn stock; snitches trade it for leniency. Devalues your inventory overnight.
    • Examples: A "free sample" post in #89 flooded the market with hot dumps — prices tanked 30% for a week.
    • Safer Plays: Samples only: "Track2: 1234567890123456=25051234567890123456?" Use escrow for trades. Vet via helpers first.
  4. Comms & Metadata (Low-Medium Risk: Cumulative Profiling)
    • What to Lock Down: Chat logs/screenshots (TG/Discord with timestamps), error dumps from attempts (e.g., "Declined: AVS mismatch at 14:23 EST"), or media with EXIF (geo/tags from phone cams).
    • Why It Burns: Patterns reveal timings/locations (e.g., all errors from a Paris IP cluster). Aggregated, it's a profile for targeted raids.
    • Examples: Blurry screenshot in a reply thread (#204) still leaked a timezone — traced to a French op that got heat from Europol.
    • Safer Plays: Describe: "Got AVS fail on US bin — common?" Strip metadata with ExifTool or MAT2. Use draw.io for diagrams, not photos.

Quick Risk Matrix (For Your Next Post)​


Info TypeLeak Likelihood (1-5)Impact if Leaked (1-5)Mitigation Priority
Personal IDs4 (Easy to slip)5 (Dox/Raid)Critical — Never public
Op Details3 (Tempting to share)4 (Theft/Bans)High — PM only
Assets5 (Shiny object syndrome)3 (Market flood)Medium — Samples max
Comms/Meta2 (Hidden)2 (Slow build)Low — But habit-forming

Overarching Rules to Live By:
  • TOR + Multi-VPN Stack: Never post from op sessions. I run Whonix for forum, separate Mullvad for shops.
  • Anonymity Layers: Burner everything — Temp mails via 10minutemail, VMs for testing. Audit with Panopticlick.
  • Forum-Specific: Rule #3 violations get infractions (3 strikes = ban). Mods log IPs, so rotate.
  • If It Feels Off: When in doubt, encrypt and PM. Better paranoid than perma-banned.

This shit's a game of shadows — stay layered, stay learning. OP, what's the spark for this thread? Burned by a leaker, or just onboarding a crew? Drop details (redacted), and I'll tailor more. Helpers above, if you're reading — reps appreciated. Let's keep carder.market the spot where noobs level up, not get farmed.
 
Top